作者简介

Herbert George Blumer earned his doctorate in 1928 at the University of Chicago and went on to teach there until 1951. He later became the founding chair of the Department of Sociology at the University of California, Berkeley. In 1983 the American Sociological Association honored him with its Career of Distinguished Scholarship Award, acknowledging the importance of his codification of the fundamental theoretical and methodological tenets of the sociological perspective that he called symbolic interactionism.

内容简介

This is a collection of articles dealing with the point of view of symbolic interactionism and with the topic of methodology in the discipline of sociology. It is written by the leading figure in the school of symbolic interactionism, and presents what might be regarded as the most authoritative statement of its point of view, outlining its fundamental premises and sketching their implications for sociological study. Blumer states that symbolic interactionism rests on three premises: that human beings act toward things on the basis of the meanings of things have for them; that the meaning of such things derives from the social interaction one has with one's fellows; and that these meanings are handled in, and modified through, an interpretive process.


Herbert George Blumer earned his doctorate in 1928 at the University of Chicago and went on to teach there until 1951. He later became the founding chair of the Department of Sociology at the University of California, Berkeley. In 1983 the American Sociological Association honored him with its Career of Distinguished Scholarship Award, acknowledging the importance of his codifi...

下载地址

豆瓣评论

  • toIsaiah
    建构主义的经典著作。09-19
  • Sea son
    2018在芝大买的第一本纸质书。写得非常清楚。01-10
  • 泽不伐夭
    对mass media提言的部分就像是给我们挖大坑。。01-09
  • 朱雀
    符号互动论(symbolic interactionism)之前设:交流构建意义;自我是行为动机;关系存乎个体社会之间。由前设推知:1)人基于其对事物之赋义而行动2)所赋之义,源自其人与他者/社会之互动3)意义是人向其所遭遇事物之操持、变造性阐绎(Blumer比之Mead还是没有什么突破社会学收尾24th06-09
  • 东林遗孤
    第一章和第二章确实有东西,对米德思想的解析很不错,美国建构主义的起源,虽然理论本身并不深入。中间的认识论方法论文章车轱辘话多,虽然反对量化本身没有任何问题,但翻来覆去都是差不多的事。后面那些所谓反思性的论文(包括概念啊民意啊媒体啊)我看得很懵,有些虚空打靶的感觉,可能确实是离那个年代太远了。11-03

猜你喜欢

大家都喜欢