作者简介

Luigi Tomba is a Senior Fellow at the Australian Centre on China in the World, Australian National University. He is the author of Paradoxes of Labour Reform: Chinese Labour Theory and Practice from Socialism to the Market and coeditor of The China Journal.

内容简介

Chinese residential communities are places of intense governing and an arena of active political engagement between state and society. In The Government Next Door, Luigi Tomba investigates how the goals of a government consolidated in a distant authority materialize in citizens' everyday lives. Chinese neighborhoods reveal much about the changing nature of governing practices in the country. Government action is driven by the need to preserve social and political stability, but such priorities must adapt to the progressive privatization of urban residential space and an increasingly complex set of societal forces. Tomba’s vivid ethnographic accounts of neighborhood life and politics in Beijing, Shenyang, and Chengdu depict how such local "translation" of government priorities takes place.

Tomba reveals how different clusters of residential space are governed more or less intensely depending on the residents’ social status; how disgruntled communities with high unemployment are still managed with the pastoral strategies typical of the socialist tradition, while high-income neighbors are allowed greater autonomy in exchange for a greater concern for social order. Conflicts are contained by the gated structures of the neighborhoods to prevent systemic challenges to the government, and middle-class lifestyles have become exemplars of a new, responsible form of citizenship. At times of conflict and in daily interactions, the penetration of the state discourse about social stability becomes clear.


Luigi Tomba is a Senior Fellow at the Australian Centre on China in the World, Australian National University. He is the author of Paradoxes of Labour Reform: Chinese Labour Theory and Practice from Socialism to the Market and coeditor of The China Journal.

下载地址

豆瓣评论

  • 纪恩同学
    在了解学术脉络以后觉得还是写得很好的。07-31
  • dromobabel
    感觉写得有点散,毕竟是长期的田野经历的积累。一些部分可以往政府策略上靠,但靠得有点生硬,而且未免脑补得过多,说服力差一点。不过从和谐社会到他并未论及的核心价值观的脉络可以看出,作者的讨论还是有先见之明的。不过还是把自己的一些初步的想法和作者的讨论靠上了。09-21
  • murmur
    理论野心大,对城市新兴“中产阶级”的政治行动力的判断也挺到位的。但相比起来田野材料就太碎太单薄了,撑不起来那些论点。09-29
  • 暮兮云
    作者试图证明国家在社区治理中的两种治理术。在下岗工人社区,通过强化居委会、街道办,国家既提供福利又监视社会。在城市小区,国家以住房改革吸引中产,同时以"社区自治“和”“素质”的话语(discourse)鼓励对其他社会阶层的拒斥,以此维系城市空间分隔和社会稳定。前一半Read已写得很详细;后一半视角虽新但可靠性存疑。诚然,社会控制不都是通过压制性(repressive)手段实现的。但仅凭政府和中产在话语上的重叠(convergence),就认定两者之间存在"共识"(consensus,本书语境中或可理解为“合谋”),一切都是计划的一部分,脑补太多。说远一点,中国研究应该“求同”而非“求异”。比如,先看segregation和gentrification的普遍经验,再看中国是否特别、为何特别。03-12
  • Chopin J.F.YU
    雖然還是在「治理術」的框架內,但提出了consensus這個有意義的觀點,其實是非常值得進一步深思的。事實上,在解決了執政合法性的論證之後,如果能再進一步,所謂的國家治理,實際上是一種complicity,或許未嘗不是一個大膽但有趣的推論。04-22

猜你喜欢

大家都喜欢