内容简介

In this extraordinary work Gilles Deleuze, the most renowned living philosopher in France, reflects on one of the figures of the past who has most influenced his own sweeping reconfiguration of the tasks of philosophy.Deleuze's brilliant text shows how current definitions of philosophy do not apply to Spinoza: a solitary thinker (yet scandalous and hated), he conceived of philosophy as an enterprise of liberation and radical demystification much as did Leibniz or, later Nietzsche. Spinoza confronts the grand philosophical problems that are still current today: the comparative role of ontology (the theory of substance), of epistemology (the theory of ideas), and of political anthropology (the theory of modes, passions, and actions).The goal of this book is to determine the rapport among the univocity of Being in the theory of substance; the production of truth and the genesis of sense in the theory of ideas; and practical joy (or the elimination of the sad passions) and the selective organization of the passions in the theory of modes.

下载地址

豆瓣评论

  • Adynamia
    德勒兹早年对尼采和斯宾诺莎哲学的研究为他后来的形而上学体系打下了非常重要的基础。此书中若干概念,比如affect, express-triad, body, univocity在D & R 中得以发展延伸。E in P可以说是德勒兹早期著作中最重要的一部。04-24
  • sonoko
    Aug2018, May2019, Aug2020, Jan202103-01
  • Leo
    很有启发。德勒兹哲学史的功力比现在专门研究哲学史的人高到不知道哪里去了。很多看似跳跃的论证,只要熟悉哲学史的背景就能发现不仅不跳跃还十分具有洞见。对斯各特的发现很有趣,尽管他自己也承认斯宾诺莎可能完全没读过司各特。力量和表现的思考也很精彩,不能说我自己完全明白德勒兹在说什么了,但是是一个值得继续去思考的方向。07-20
  • 我魔法少女呢
    德勒兹对泛神论的态度实在太模糊,,,12-19
  • Blue on Pink
    标题里明明只有斯宾诺莎,但整本书从introduction到conclusion都不断地拿斯宾诺莎和莱布尼茨以及笛卡尔做比较,法国人这论文写得真是够随意07-09

猜你喜欢

大家都喜欢