内容简介

Why do governments turn to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and with what effects? This book argues that governments enter IMF programs for economic and political reasons, and finds that the effects are negative on economic growth and income distribution. By bringing in the IMF, governments gain political leverage - via conditionality - to push through unpopular policies. Note that if governments desiring conditions are more likely to participate, estimating program effects is not straightforward: one must control for the potentially unobserved political determinants of selection. This book addresses the selection problem using a dynamic bivariate version of the Heckman model analyzing cross-national time-series data. The main finding is that the negative effects of IMF programs on economic growth are mitigated for certain constituencies since programs also have distributional consequences. But IMF programs doubly hurt the least well off in society: they lower growth and shift the income distribution upward.

下载地址

豆瓣评论

  • Solomon
    通过与IMF签署协议,行政机构将其对经济改革的政策偏好与IMF的条件捆绑起来。一个国家的行政机构可以独自与IMF签署协议,但为遵守IMF条件而进行的政策改变则需要否决行为体的同意。IMF的卷入提高了反对行政机构倡议的成本,因为反对的对象不再仅仅是行政机构而是IMF。(p14) 书中第二章用了坦桑尼亚、尼日利亚、乌拉圭的案例,意在说明为何有些国家在非常需要贷款时不与IMF签订协议,而另一些国家在不那么需要贷款时为何与IMF签订协议。01-17
  • Zoe
    加入IMF project跟缺钱没关系,IMF participation是用来增加反对党拒绝proposed policy的成本的,IMF只是幌子。IO和domestic politics的关系真是剪不断理还乱。07-26

猜你喜欢

大家都喜欢