作者简介

Tie Xiao is Assistant Professor in the Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures at Indiana University.

内容简介

During China’s transition from dynastic empire to nation-state, the crowd emerged as a salient trope. Intellectuals across the ideological spectrum have used the crowd trope to ruminate on questions of selfhood and nationhood, and to advance competing models of enlightenment and revolution.

Revolutionary Waves analyzes the centrality of the crowd in the Chinese cultural and political imagination and its global resonances by delving into a wide range of fiction, philosophy, poetry, and psychological studies. Bringing together literary studies, intellectual history, critical theory, and the history of human sciences, this interdisciplinary work highlights unexplored interactions among emerging social-scientific forms of knowledge, new aesthetic modes of representation, and changing political imperatives. The work brings into relief the complexities of the modern Chinese crowd discourse, which generated subjectivities and oriented actions, enabled as well as constrained the expression of togetherness, and thus both expanded and limited the horizon of political possibilities in the emerging age of mass politics.

The first in-depth examination of the aesthetics and politics of the crowd in modern Chinese literature and thought, Revolutionary Waves raises questions about the promise and peril of community as communion and reimagines collective life in China’s post-socialist present.


Tie Xiao is Assistant Professor in the Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures at Indiana University.

下载地址

豆瓣评论

  • 吃饱了撑着才
    作者想要处理的是从群众的污名化(知识分子的纠结)到延安改造,WG的神圣化群众的脉络。一边是先锋党的问题,一边是非理性的情感的角色的问题。问题是群“的概念太大了,以至于有点变成一个什么都能装的筐(想象),在串起历史叙事的时候容易流于表面,而不够有穿透力。20C的前半个50年,跨度很大,野心也很大,但是感觉无法在一个文学史的框架(虽然作者显然是跨学科了)下完成。忽略具体的社会史语境(阶层,阶级,到底是什么人群),忽略群学(社会学)的其他发展,撑不起来这么大个题目。感觉更适合这本书的深层线索是:城市史和农村的问题(crowd在特定的语境下到底指的是大都会的驳杂人群还是农村的农民群众);身体和情感的问题;无政府主义与大众革命关系的问题。比较有启发的点是勒庞和朱谦之的个案串起前后的对照。06-29
  • 豆友2217079
    現代中國的「群眾」概念12-29
  • 越洋鲫鱼
    Nicholas把Mazzarella跟这本放在同一周读真的匠心独具。目前看到的最好的切入20世纪初中国知识分子建国焦虑的做法。问题当然不是中国没有人民(当然是假的),而是谁必须要说“中国没有人民”10-10
  • underdog
    Getting insipid while proceeding toward its end.08-24

猜你喜欢

大家都喜欢