作者简介

A.J. is the principal visionary and founding father of Personality Junkie®, which he conceived in 2009 with the aim of exploring the theoretical underpinnings of psychological type and related areas of personality study. His research has primarily involved Jungian / Myers-Briggs® typology, while remaining conversant with the Enneagram and Big Five models as well. A.J. has authored four books on typology and currently boasts the two best-selling INTP books Amazon.com. His work has been referenced in numerous books, articles, and e-publications.
In its broadest form, A.J.’s primary interest area is human subjectivity. He is particularly concerned with how the architecture of the mind—our “subjective lens”—shapes our beliefs, values, interests, biases, etc. He believes that investigating the nature of our psychological lenses, including the contributions of personality type, can help us better understand ourselves and our presuppositions.
A.J. has also long been fascinated by the perennial question of “how to live.” On this front, he has devoted much time to exploring topics such as identity, purpose, and authenticity. He is especially interested in how clarifying our identity / purpose as individuals might help us cultivate more meaningful and effective lives. He has found typology useful in this respect as well, drawing on its insights regarding the respective strengths and roles of the personality types.
Consistent with his own type (INTP), A.J. brings an explorative and synthetic approach to personality studies. Novices and professionals alike appreciate his thought-provoking yet accessible writing style.

内容简介

INTPs are the most philosophical of all types. They love contemplating life and considering the broad ways things are interconnected. They are also concerned with the perennial question of “how to live.” They loathe the idea of a mediocre life and have a deep sense that they should be doing something important. But in order to know what that entails, they feel they must first know themselves; self-knowledge must precede action. Unfortunately, pinning down who they are is rarely as easy as it might seem. It can take years, even decades, for INTPs to find themselves. And as much as they’d like to, they can’t put their lives on hold while they figure themselves out. Hence, they may at times feel forced to make unwanted compromises in their careers or relationships. Despite these challenges, INTPs can and do progress in their quest. And this book can aid and expedite that process. Through the structured lens of personality typology, it reveals the deeper sources of their struggles and dilemmas, as well as potential solutions. If you’re looking for a clear, honest, and penetrating analysis of the INTP, this book is for you. Chapter 1 contains a general overview, as well as a function-by-function analysis, of the INTP personality type, including a look at the tug-of-war between the INTP’s dominant (Ti) and inferior (Fe) function. Chapter 2 examines INTPs’ typical course of growth and development across the lifespan. Chapter 3 explores the “negative potentials” of the INTP personality type. This includes a careful look at the INTP’s “dark side,” as well as the degree to which INTPs are prone to various psychological problems such as depression, ADD, autism/Asperger’s, narcissism, etc. Chapter 4 tackles one of the INTP’s most poignant and recurrent concerns—their quest for truth and meaning. Chapter 5 examines INTPs’ political, religious, and philosophical propensities. This includes analyses of the relative contributions of each of the INTP’s four functions to the ways in which they see and understand the world. Chapter 6 dives deeply into some of INTPs’ most pressing career concerns. This includes addressing issues such as the degree to which they should focus on the intrinsic versus extrinsic value of their work, the pluses and minuses of working independently, the potential merits of a day job, creative versus analytical careers, etc. This chapter also enumerates the INTP’s most common career strengths and interest areas, drawing on the six “RIASEC” interest themes developed by John Holland. Furthermore, it examines the relative merits of specific careers and majors—the hard sciences, social/moral sciences, computers/IT, freelancing, scholarship, medicine, psychology, etc.—in light of the INTP’s personality, skills, values, and interests. Chapter 7 explores the ways INTPs think and function with respect to relationships, including their unconscious motivations. It also discusses relationships as a forum for learning and experimentation, the danger of concealing negative thoughts and assumptions, INTP communication issues, Ti-Fe identity issues, and INTP attitudes toward family and parenting. Chapter 8 might be viewed as an extension of Chapter 7. It explores, on a type-by-type basis, how INTPs may fare when paired with various personality types. Chapter 9 compares and contrasts INTPs with related personality types—INTJs, ENTPs, ISTPs, and INFPs. By highlighting noteworthy similarities and differences, this chapter will help INTPs better distinguish themselves from these other types.


A.J. is the principal visionary and founding father of Personality Junkie®, which he conceived in 2009 with the aim of exploring the theoretical underpinnings of psychological type and related areas of personality study. His research has primarily involved Jungian / Myers-Briggs® typology, while remaining conversant with the Enneagram and Big Five models as well. A.J. has autho...

下载地址

豆瓣评论

  • 電波発射
    真正的intp自救指南。虽然我是假的,但还是能参考一下。se残疾的intp需要多走出门去感受,不残疾也去给我感受外界,不然长时间陷入ti感受不到fe(意义)会抑郁,并且fi会通过无意识不断涌现从而击垮intp。职业选择那章,作者将科学分为“‘Hard’Sciences”和“‘Soft’Sciences”,其实就是自然科学和人文社科。作者认为自然科学大多需要进行实验,要求收集精确数据,这会让intp感到枯燥;人文社科大多是对显而易见的事实进行分析,同样对喜欢提出和掌握新概念、新方法的intp来说不适合。突然觉得语言学太适合intp了,很ti很ne,尽管语言学分在人文社科下面,但它与自然科学的分支学科能够重叠,可以满足intp乐于获取新知、探索未知领域的心理。08-07
  • 20210419《INTPer自救指南》!(解决了Fe和意义探索的问题,出现了对自我类型(INFP)怀疑的问题……orz)update:应该是INTP,不过管他呢,找到问题的解决方案就好了~20210422好像找到了自律(自我管理)的方法。20210424是高Fi的intp。04-18
  • 洗半个西瓜
    或许每个INTP都可以来看看,作为Lone wolf 和Nice Guy的混合体,琢磨这种矛盾的缘由和可能的解决方法,很是有助于建立自己内心的秩序。02-15
  • Nittin
    觉得这个模型大体上还比较符合我,上一个让我觉得很贴近的模型是女性阿斯伯格人格模型,上一个是敏感性人格,再上一个是卡尼霍伦的神经症人格,再上一个是米德尔马契里的多萝西娅和卡苏朋。总的来说就是我看很多模型都觉得符合自己,但这个目前算是比较整体可以统筹多个方面,可信与否需要事实的验证。极度倾向逻辑、内向思考、搜集信息,最差的是外向情感,这算是最准的了,事实上我确实非常难和别人共情,察觉自己的感情也都需要仔细地辩证分析。至今还记得第一次认真思考嫉妒这种感情时的惊讶:它的模型竟然如此精巧且复杂。05-29
  • sange
    第一本读完的英文原著mark。感觉不太像是intp的思维写出来的书,或许是我没有看过作者的16 personality types和my true type。至少在这本书里,没有清晰地建构功能体系,代之以描述性而非逻辑的论述,需要在零散的论述中重新搭建体系,比较累,当然其结论我觉得颇有启发性。06-02

猜你喜欢

大家都喜欢