Against Interpretation and Other Essays

当初买来当做reference翻来翻去，翻到今天总算通读过一遍了，有些篇章重读了几次，每一次在不同的时间看都带来全新的思考。以前比较有感触的是讲戈达尔和布列松，现在比较有感触的是讲施托克豪森和尤内斯库。01-16

电影都看过再看这本正好09-21

Got excited reading this book every single time 08-13

其实不是什么艰深的道理，不是走到了思考的末端，在最边际开疆拓土。但是Sontag 给自己开了一块田地，上演瀑布。瀑布，主要是从experience of language这个角度，思考的层层绽放。[excerpt] … Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Dostoevsky, Kafka, Baudelaire, Rimbaud, Genet—and Simone Weil—have their authority with us precisely because of their air of unhealthiness. Their unhealthiness is their soundness, and is what carries conviction.03-16

断断续续居然也读了个差不离，against interpretation, on style, notes on camp三篇鼎鼎大名的文论居然是在同一个集子里。Sontag很适合去写aphorism, sharp and terse and satirical. 那句”art is seduction, not rape”是可以印在T恤上级别的slogan。10-23

I feel like Susan’s words elevate my thinking and consciousness to another level because I have that long-lost “oh my god how can my previous assumptions be so naive and crude” feeling again. Added to being intellectually stimulating and nourishing is this book’s good writing style, for which alone it is worth reading 11-21

In place of a hermeneutics we need an erotics of art.11-20

写得真好，用词都很精准。就是很多例子看不懂导致get不到…能get到的都还很有趣，看得很透03-17

Notes on "Camp": "To talk about Camp is therefore to betray it"，于是呢我接着去看Monty Phyton了www10-29

还记得那天坐在国贸二期楼下吃饭，读了又读。在世界上最忙碌的写字楼之一里读桑塔格像是一种无言的抵抗（抵抗什么？）02-20

就读了Part 1 & 2, 可以说还比较失望，虽然Sontag的文笔极好，收获不少金玉良言，但前两篇有关艺术评论的随笔浅尝辄止，提出了the aesthetic vs. the conceptual, 批判了文学理论和罗兰巴特的中性写作强调了stylistic decisions的重要性后没有展开讨论stylistic core 后面附文有关Camus的写作 Leiris的写作 青年Lukács的Marxist文学也都是擦边球 既和前两篇联系不紧密也是围绕着进行写作 旁征博引但没有一针见血 那作为艺评也许有待改进08-14

读下来极为流畅。其实她写很多论文的时候，实则是在吐槽某些文学家，譬如她讽刺的scientistnovelist C P Snow03-01

向她老学写作！（esp. 积累形容词与句法）01-03